Automated deep learning framework categorizes breast tissue samples, improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
Breast cancer is a prominent contributor to cancer-related fatalities among women globally, and early detection via histopathological examination, despite being regarded as the benchmark method, is frequently time-consuming and prone to subjectivity. To overcome these challenges, we introduce an automated deep learning framework that categorizes Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained breast tissue samples into four groups: normal tissue, benign lesions, localized malignant tumors, and invasive carcinoma. Our system utilizes intermediate feature embeddings from the Xception (Extreme Inception) architecture to derive discriminative features, attaining 98% precision, a 0.969 kappa metric, and exceptional AUC-ROC 0.998 and AUC-PR 0.995 values on the raw (non-normalized) dataset, with heightened detection rates for localized malignant tumors 96% and invasive carcinoma, 99%. We also assessed four stain standardization methods (Reinhard, Ruifrok, Macenko, and Vahadane) and found that Macenko normalization yielded the strongest results: 97.79% accuracy, kappa = 0.965, AUC-ROC = 0.997, AUC-PR = 0.991. However, unprocessed images still outperformed all normalized versions. A comparative study revealed that our method exceeds baseline AlexNet and state-of-the-art deep learning architectures (VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, and conventional Xception), highlighting its capability to improve diagnostic reliability while confirming that stain normalization, though viable, does not surpass the effectiveness of the unaltered dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: