Why the study?
Severe aortic stenosis can cause acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock, but the role of TAVI in this critically ill setting is poorly evaluated.
Does emergency TAVI affect 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to elective TAVI?
Does emergency TAVI affect 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to elective TAVI?
Emergency TAVI in critically ill patients with severe aortic stenosis carries high 90-day mortality, especially in those with cardiogenic shock, but survivors have long-term outcomes comparable to elective TAVI patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emergency TAVI in shock warrants careful risk-benefit assessment; leaves open net benefit versus medical management in critically ill aortic stenosis.
AIMS: Severe aortic stenosis can cause acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock (CS). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard therapy for aortic stenosis in inoperable patients. However, its role in this setting is poorly evaluated. The study purpose was to explore clinical characteristics of these patients and to assess predictors of mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 2930 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at our centre between 2013 and 2019 were screened for critically ill patients, receiving intensive care therapy and emergency TAVI. Selected patients were subdivided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of CS. Remaining patients undergoing elective TAVI served as a comparison. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Out of 179 critically ill patients, 47 fulfilled criteria of CS (shock group) and 132 did not despite a severe decompensation (no shock group). Shock patients were more often male and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores [15.6, interquartile range (8.0-32.1) vs. 5.5 (3.9-8.5), P < 0.01] compared with severely decompensated patients. Ninety-day mortality was: shock group, 42.6%, vs. no shock group, 15.9%, vs. elective group, 5.3% (P < 0.01). A landmark analysis from day 90 showed similar mortality (P = 0.29). Compared with elective patients, 30-day composite endpoint device failure was higher in critically ill groups [shock group, odds ratio, 2.86 (1.43-5.36), no shock group, odds ratio, 1.74 (1.09-2.69)]. Multivariable regression revealed mechanical ventilation, haemofiltration, elevated C-reactive protein or bilirubin, and hypotension before TAVI as 90-day mortality predictors. CONCLUSION: Ninety-day mortality after TAVI in critically ill patients is increased but survivors have similar outcomes as elective patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steffen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: