Why the study?
While guidelines support MitraClip for high or prohibitive surgical risk patients, many remain anatomically unsuited, amidst an expanding armamentarium of transcatheter repair and replacement strategies.
This review outlines the approach to selecting transcatheter treatment options for high-risk patients with mitral regurgitation, including management of therapy failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide transcatheter option selection for high-risk mitral regurgitation; leaves open optimal management of therapy failure.
Over the last decade, multiple transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement strategies have emerged, yet there is only 1 US Food and Drug Administration approved device, the MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Current guidelines support the use of the MitraClip in high or prohibitive surgical risk patients, but there are many patients that are not anatomically suited for the device. This review article discusses the approach to degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation in the high-prohibitive risk patient, how to choose transcatheter treatment options (both approved and investigational), and potential management for therapy failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basman et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: