Why the study?
Does initial heart rate predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
Does initial heart rate predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, both low and high initial heart rates are markers of high risk, with tachycardia predicting heart failure and bradycardia predicting one-month mortality.
May refine ACS risk stratification at presentation; extends observational data but leaves causal effects and interventions unproven.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of on-admission heart rate (HR) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from the second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Patients were divided according to their initial HR into: (I: < 60, II: 60-69, III: 70-79, IV: 80-89 and V: ≥ 90 bpm). Patients' characteristics and hospital and one- and 12-month outcomes were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Among 7939 consecutive ACS patients, groups I to V represented 7%, 13%, 20%, 23.5%, and 37%, respectively. Mean age was higher in groups I and V. Group V were more likely males, diabetic and hypertensive. ST-elevation myocardial infarction was the main presentation in groups I and V. Reperfusion therapies were less likely given to group V. Beta blockers were more frequently prescribed to group III in comparison to groups with higher HR. Groups I and V were associated with worse hospital outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed initial tachycardia as an independent predictor for heart failure (OR 2.2; 95%CI: 1.39-3.32), while bradycardia was independently associated with higher one-month mortality (OR 2.0; 95%CI: 1.04-3.85) CONCLUSION: The majority of ACS patients present with tachycardia. However, low or high HR is a marker of high risk that needs more attention and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asaad et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: