Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicentre retrospective study reveals class-specific survival responses to targeted and immune therapies in BRAF-mutant lung cancer, highlighting distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities.
BACKGROUND: mutations poses substantial challenges due to biological heterogeneity, different clinicogenomic features and limited therapy outcome data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: mutation patients in the national Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer, assessing treatment outcomes upon targeted and (chemo-)immune therapy. Additionally, we evaluated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation potential of selected, previously not characterized mutations in vitro. RESULTS: mutations undergoing targeted and/or (chemo-)immune therapy were identified. Patients with class I mutations achieved the longest progression-free survival (PFS) under targeted therapy [median PFS (mPFS) 9.8 months], whereas chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy led to an mPFS of 35 and 27 months, respectively. In patients with class II mutations, targeted therapy led to an mPFS of 6.3 months while chemotherapy, chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy resulted in an mPFS of 3.5, 3.7 and 3.6 months, respectively. Preclinical characterization demonstrated MEK phosphorylation potential and hence actionability of BRAF class II mutations G469A, G469R, G469V and BRAF K601. Patients exhibiting class III mutations did not respond to targeted therapy (mPFS 2.6 months), but showed responses to chemotherapy (mPFS 4.2 months), chemoimmunotherapy (mPFS 10.9 months) and immunotherapy (mPFS 7 months). CONCLUSIONS: mutations, facilitating personalized treatment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kropf-Sanchen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: