Evaluates telecommuting impacts on transportation efficiency and emissions, suggesting policy implications for urban mobility.
Telecommuting is recognized as a sustainable urban mobility strategy; however, its quantitative impacts on network performance and air quality remains insufficiently understood, particularly in developing countries. This study develops an integrated spatial framework that directly links a travel demand forecasting model (EMME/2) with the International Vehicle Emissions (IVE) model to empirically evaluate the effect of telecommuting on network performance and emission hotspots in Tehran. Two scenarios-Business-As-Usual (BAU) and Telecommuting (TELE)-are simulated within EMME/2. The outputs, including vehicle kilometers traveled and speed are employed as primary inputs for the IVE model in order to estimate on-road emissions of major pollutants. The results show that implementation of a 20% telecommuting scenario might decrease total Vehicle Kilometers Traveled (VKT) and Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) by 4.6% and 10.9%, respectively; furthermore, the results indicate reductions in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, and PM by up to 7.9%, 7.9%, 5.9%, 4.5%, and 4.4% respectively during the morning peak hour. It's worth mentioning that spatial analysis highlights important emission reduction within the Low-Emission Zone (LEZ) and Restricted-Traffic Zone (RTZ) of Tehran, where most daily business trips are concentrated. The findings provide novel empirical evidence from a developing-country context, demonstrating that even moderate levels of telecommuting adoption can substantially enhance both transportation network efficiency and urban air quality. The framework proposed in this study provides policymakers with a robust, data-driven tool for evaluating travel demand management (TDM) strategies aimed at supporting sustainable urban development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baghestani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: