Applied research program evaluates community participation in young adults with disabilities, suggesting increased confidence and engagement.
Importance: This study supports community participation for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Objective: To develop and evaluate a program promoting community participation for young adults with IDD. Design: This applied research study involved program development and partial implementation. Although designed as a four-month intervention, a one-month pilot implementation was conducted. Data were collected via online surveys and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Settings: The program was developed and implemented in collaboration with FOCUS, a local nonprofit organization supporting families of children with special needs. Participants: Participants included young adults (18+) with IDD who were active members of FOCUS. Eighteen individuals were recruited through FOCUS and volunteered to participate. Intervention: The program included virtual modules, in-person group events, and a toolkit resource. The full program consisted of 16 events across four months; however, only a subset was implemented. Outcome and Measures: Primary outcomes included participant confidence in community participation, measured using pre/post surveys. A feedback survey assessed participant experiences. Feasibility was evaluated through attendance rates. Results: The final program included 8 modules promoting community participation through volunteering. Attendance was higher for in-person events. Pre/post results indicated increased participant confidence following participation. Feedback survey data reflected generally positive experiences. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest the program may enhance confidence and support community engagement among young adults with IDD. Results support the potential for occupational therapy–informed programs at a population level. Occupational therapy practitioners can assist organizations in developing resources that facilitate meaningful community engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sophia DeLise (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: