Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines legitimacy strategies of NGOs on social media, uncovering complex discourses and implications.
Approaching legitimacy discourses through the lens of post-humanitarianism, this study examines discursive legitimacy strategies in international NGOs’ social media communication. The findings identify seven strategies through which NGOs negotiate legitimacy via an ambivalent assemblage of palatable pity, institutional branding, and compensatory discourses. While these strategies do not reflect a wholesale adoption of post-humanitarianism, they reveal complex, layered attempts in which NGOs simultaneously mobilize multiple logics of legitimation. In doing so, they produce problematic articulations of humanitarian subjectivities and aid relations, while mediating depoliticized claims to legitimacy. Overall, the study calls for critical reflection on legitimacy construction within digital humanitarian communication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Dokyum Kim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: