Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental and numerical methods reveal the impact of isolator stiffness on vibration transmission in cylindrical shell structures, suggesting lower stiffness for better performance.
Optimizing isolator stiffness is essential for controlling vibration transmission in cylindrical shell structures operating in cross-environment conditions. This study investigates the influence of isolator stiffness on vibration transmission and fluid-coupled response through coordinated land-based experiments, water-immersed experiments, and ABAQUS simulations. Two damped spring isolators with stiffness values of 290 N/mm and 970 N/mm were tested under representative excitations of 25 Hz and 40 Hz. The results show that the lower-stiffness isolator provides consistently stronger vibration attenuation and produces higher vibration level differences than the higher-stiffness isolator. The measured vibration level differences between land-based and water-immersed conditions remain generally within 3 dB, indicating good cross-environment consistency. The numerical results agree well with the experimental trends, with deviations generally below 5 dB in the main low-frequency range. Mechanism analysis indicates that reducing isolator stiffness weakens the transmission of excitation energy from the raft frame to the base and shell, thereby reducing near-field fluid-coupled response around the excitation region. These findings support the use of lower-stiffness isolators and provide a practical framework for vibration assessment and parameter selection in cylindrical shell structures working under coupled air–water conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: