Unraveling the Spectral–Spatial Mechanisms of Mineral Identification: A Case Study on CASI Data Using SpectralFormer and Traditional Classifiers

Traditional diagnostic spectroscopy provides a physically interpretable basis for mineral identification. However, how modern classifiers balance spectral and spatial information remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates this issue using CASI airborne hyperspectral data from the Liuyuan area, China. A geologically constrained ground-truth dataset was constructed based on expert knowledge and a semi-automatic Spectral Hourglass workflow. We evaluated representative shallow machine learning methods and deep learning models, including a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN), Vision Transformer (ViT), and SpectralFormer. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) achieved the highest overall accuracy but showed a strong bias toward dominant background classes and failed to reliably detect rare minerals such as jarosite. Deep learning models improved class balance by incorporating broader spectral features. However, excessive spatial aggregation reduced their sensitivity to small and fragmented alteration zones. SpectralFormer models hyperspectral data as ordered spectral sequences and showed more stable performance for spectrally similar and rare minerals. Multi-scale experiments reveal a spectral-dominant discrimination mechanism. Increasing the spectral receptive field improves classification up to an optimal level. In contrast, overly large spatial patches introduce background interference and obscure diagnostic absorption features. These findings highlight the fundamental role of spectral continuity in airborne hyperspectral alteration mineral mapping and clarify the trade-offs involved in integrating spatial context.