Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study examines clinical profiles and outcomes of perforation peritonitis in a surgical setting, suggesting effective management strategies.
Background: Perforation peritonitis is a common surgical emergency. Perforation peritonitis results from the perforation of a diseased viscus, abdominal trauma, ingestion of a foreign body, and iatrogenic perforation. The diagnosis is made by clinical symptoms and signs. Aims and Objectives: The present study was carried out to study various etiological factors, mode of clinical presentation, management, and outcome of perforation peritonitis in a tertiary care setting. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with perforation peritonitis was done over a period of 5 years (February 2019–March 2024) in the Department of Surgery Government Medical College (GMC), Kathua, India. All cases with perforation peritonitis as a result of perforation in any part of gastrointestinal tract at time of surgery were included in the study. Results: A total of 310 patients of perforation peritonitis were included in the study, with a mean age of 47.30 years. There were 86.45% male patients. Only 27.74% patients presented within 24 h of onset of symptoms. Overall, 308 patients were treated surgically, and only two patients were managed conservatively. Overall mortality in this study was 3.87%. Conclusion: The majority of perforation peritonitis comprised of peptic ulcer perforation, followed by appendicular and typhoid ileal perforations. Overall morbidity and mortality were acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: