Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the impact of SCMS on hydration heat and strength in concrete, suggesting effective binder formulation strategies.
Achieving low hydration heat without sacrificing strength is essential for early-age temperature-crack control in concrete. This study designed a low-heat Portland cement (LHPC)–fly ash (FA)–ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS)–silica fume (SF) binder system with LHPC fixed at 80 wt.% and total supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) fixed at 20 wt.%. Compressive strength at 3, 7, and 28 d, 7 d isothermal calorimetry combined with Krstulović–Dabić (K–D) modeling, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to identify a low-heat/high-strength pathway. The mixture containing 20 wt.% FA (F20) reduced the 7 d cumulative heat to 194.060 J·g−1 but lowered the 28 d compressive strength to 44.2 MPa. Replacing FA with GGBS under the same replacement level restored the strength baseline, and the mixture containing 20 wt.% GGBS (G20) reached 56.7 MPa. Introducing SF created an optimum compositional window, and the mixture containing 10 wt.% FA, 3 wt.% GGBS, and 7 wt.% SF (F10G3S7) achieved the highest 28 d strength of 58.2 MPa. Notably, the mixture containing 10 wt.% FA, 9 wt.% GGBS, and 1 wt.% SF (F10G9S1) combined relatively low 7 d heat (203.545 J·g−1) with high 28 d strength (54.2 MPa). K–D fitting showed that FA lowered the heat potential (Qmax = 217.98 J·g−1) relative to LHPC (236.19 J·g−1), whereas GGBS/SF blends increased Qmax to 268.77–271.55 J·g−1, indicating composition-dependent hydration efficiency. TGA revealed higher bound water per unit LHPC at 28 d (21.46–22.97%) than in LHPC alone (17.17%), and bound water correlated more strongly with compressive strength (R2 = 0.75–0.78) than calcium hydroxide (CH) content (R2 = 0.66–0.67). SEM confirmed a more continuous gel-rich matrix in F10G9S1, suggesting that the low-heat/high-strength route is governed by efficient heat-to-hydrate conversion and microstructural densification rather than heat output alone. These findings provide both mechanistic insight and practical guidance for proportioning low-heat, high-strength binders for concrete applications requiring early-age temperature-crack control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: