Diagnoses low-dimensional cognition's impact on scientific methodology, suggesting a new paradigm shift for understanding reality.
Modern science has long been trapped in cycles of “operationalist suspension” and “conceptual magic” at its core frontiers such as quantum measurement, dark matter and dark energy, and the hard problem of consciousness. This paper diagnoses the current situation as a systemic predicament of low-dimensional cognition: human cognition is confined to a 3+1 dimensional projection plane constituted by three major presuppositions — objective realism, low-dimensional reducibility, and linguocentrism — attempting to dissect 64-dimensional ontological reality with low-dimensional logic, thereby generating cognitive artifacts such as “explanatory gaps” and “incommensurability” when touching high-dimensional boundaries. Based on the four core axioms of YuanXian Theory — True Circle Self-Consistency (TCSC), Conservation of the Universal Factor, Unique Spacetime Manifold (T⁶⁴ Torus), and Self-Referential Mind Field Generation (SRM) — this paper argues that: (1) the physical world is a low-dimensional projection of the 64-dimensional torus T⁶⁴ onto the 4-dimensional perceptual plane; (2) consciousness and physics are complementary internal and external perspectives of the same self-referential field dynamics, and the gap is a projection artifact rather than an objective rupture; (3) mathematical structures (such as the critical line of Riemann ζ zeros) are the necessary arithmetic signatures of T⁶⁴ topological symmetry. All core derivations of the theory have been formally verified in Lean 4 and Coq, advancing it from philosophical speculation to a computable, auditable, and falsifiable scientific framework. This paper ultimately proposes that science must shift from “shadow tracing” to “ontological cognition,” completing an active paradigm elevation. 现代科学在量子测量、暗物质与暗能量、意识难题等核心前沿上,长期陷入“操作主义搁置”与“概念魔术”的循环。本文诊断这一现状为低维认知的系统性困境:人类认知被限制在由三大预设(客观实在主义、低维可还原性、语言中心主义)构成的3+1维投影平面中,试图用低维逻辑切割64维本体实在,从而在触碰高维边界时产生“解释鸿沟”、“不可通约性”等认知伪影。 基于元宪理论四大公理——真圆自洽性(TCSC)、宇宙因子守恒、时空唯一性(T⁶⁴环面)、自指心场生成(SRM),本文论证:(1)物理世界是64维环面 T⁶⁴ 在4维感知平面上的低维投影;(2)意识与物理是同一自指场动力学的内外互补视角,鸿沟是投影伪影而非客观断裂;(3)数学结构(如黎曼ζ零点临界线)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenyuan Acharya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: