Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals the fool archetype critiques social norms and exhibits cultural significance.
This article examines the archetype of the “madman/fool” (yurodivy/holy fool) as a lens for critiquing social reality in the works of Uzbek writer Khurshid Dustmuhammad and Russian author Evgeny Vodolazkin. Through a comparative analysis of Dustmuhammad’s novel Bozor (“The Bazaar”) and Vodolazkin’s Laurus (2012), the study reveals how the fool figure functions as a truth-teller who exposes the absurdity of societal norms, materialism, and historical determinism. Drawing on archetypal criticism, cultural anthropology, and literary comparativistics, the research demonstrates both universal and culture-specific manifestations of this archetype. The findings highlight its enduring relevance in contemporary literature as a tool for spiritual and social resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dilafruz Juraevna Khamraeva (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: