Evaluates risk perception for climate change decision-making in the Dominican Republic, indicating room for improvement.
Sustainable development results from the harmonious integration of economic growth, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Building on available risk analysis capacities, this study employs risk perception as a diagnostic tool to evaluate the adequacy of decision-making regarding environmental sustainability in vulnerable human settlements under a changing climate in the Dominican Republic. Using the perceived risk profile approach and a specially designed questionnaire, the research explores issues related to climate change and sustainability, targeting a population composed of decision-makers and professionals engaged in risk assessment. The findings reveal a systematic underestimation of risk across most perception variables, as well as a generally low collective risk perception. The study’s methodological framework enables the identification of proactive measures to strengthen knowledge and performance among decision-makers and stakeholders involved in advancing sustainable development in Dominican human settlements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salas-Rosario et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: