Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis reveals high prevalence of self-medication and faith healing for MSK issues, indicating the need for strategic interventions.
Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are a leading cause of disability globally, often managed initially through self-care. In low-resource settings, this manifests as self-medication and faith healing, practices poorly understood in an orthopedic context. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing these practices for MSK complaints and develop a strategic framework for their regulation. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted, combining a cross-sectional survey on knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding self-medication for MSK pain with a qualitative stakeholder analysis. Adults ( n = 250) from urban and semi-urban communities were surveyed. Concurrently, a power-interest matrix was constructed to map key stakeholders (e.g., patients, pharmacists, regulators, and faith healers) influencing these practices. Results: High prevalence of self-medication (78%) was reported for MSK complaints, primarily with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (92%). Common sources were pharmacies (85%) and previous prescriptions (65%). Faith healing was sought by 32% of respondents, often concurrently with self-medication. Key reasons included cost-effectiveness (70%), quick access (65%), and deep-seated cultural beliefs (45%). Stakeholder analysis identified pharmaceutical companies and regulators as high-power players, while local pharmacists and faith healers were high-interest, low-power influencers directly shaping community behavior. Conclusion: The use of self-medication and faith healing for MSK conditions is widespread, driven by accessibility, cost, and belief systems. A successful intervention strategy must target high-interest community-level stakeholders through education while engaging high-power regulatory bodies to control drug availability and legitimize safe practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: