Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares yielding behavior and conductivity in carbon black-carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels, revealing distinct properties based on network structure.
Colloid–polymer hydrogels are commonly encountered in various applications, from flow batteries to drug delivery. Here, we investigate hydrogels composed of hydrophobic colloidal soot particles—carbon black (CB)—and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), a food-grade polymer functionalized with hydrophobic groups that bind physically to CB particles. As previously described in Legrand et al. [Macromolecules 56, 2298–2308 (2023)], CB-CMC hydrogels exist in two forms: either electrically conductive when featuring a percolated network of CB particles decorated by CMC or insulating where isolated CB particles act as physical cross-linkers within the CMC matrix. Here, we compare the yielding transition of these two types of CB-CMC hydrogels under large amplitude oscillatory shear, combining rheometry with time-resolved ultra-small-angle x-ray scattering (TRUSAXS) and electrical conductivity measurements. Both types of hydrogels exhibit a “type III” yielding scenario, characterized by an overshoot in G″ and a monotonic decrease in G′, although the underlying microscopic mechanisms differ markedly. Conductive CB-CMC hydrogels display a yield strain γy≃6% concomitant with a drop in DC conductivity, indicative of the macroscopic rupture of the percolated CB network at length scales larger than a few micrometers, beyond the USAXS resolution. At larger strain amplitudes, the conductivity of the fluidized sample increases again, exceeding its initial value, consistent with the shear-induced formation of a transient, dynamically percolated network of CB clusters. In contrast, insulating CB-CMC hydrogels exhibit a significantly larger yield strain, γy≃60%, beyond which the sample flows and the average distance between CB particles decreases, as revealed by rheo-TRUSAXS. This structural reorganization is concomitant with a more than tenfold increase in conductivity, although it remains below that of the conductive hydrogels at rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Legrand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: