Retrospective study evaluates short-term improvements in vision and retinal thickness after faricimab injection in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization, indicating a promising treatment.
Background and Objectives: Myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) is a vision-threatening complication of pathologic myopia. While anti-VEGF monotherapy is the current standard of care, recurrence and suboptimal responses remain challenges. Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody that targets both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) to improve vascular stability. This study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of a single intravitreal faricimab injection in eyes with active mCNV. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 27 eyes from 24 patients with active mCNV, including both treatment-naïve and previously treated cases. All eyes received a single intravitreal injection of faricimab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR and central retinal thickness (CRT) via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were assessed at baseline and one month post injection. Statistical significance was determined using paired and independent t-tests (p < 0.05). Results: The study population (mean age 55.5 ± 13.9 years; mean axial length 29.3 ± 1.6 mm) showed significant improvements at one month. Mean BCVA improved from 0.77 ± 0.71 logMAR to 0.51 ± 0.52 logMAR (p < 0.005). Mean CRT decreased from 290.2 ± 66.0 μm to 242.5 ± 45.7 μm (p < 0.005). No ocular adverse events, such as intraocular inflammation, retinal detachment, or endophthalmitis, were observed. Conclusions: A single intravitreal injection of faricimab provides significant short-term functional and anatomical improvement in this small retrospective series. Dual inhibition of VEGF-A and Ang-2 appears to be a safe and effective approach for stabilizing retinal vasculature in patients with high myopia. Larger, long-term prospective studies are needed to determine optimal treatment intervals for mCNV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: