Demonstrates how non-holding fixes structural conditions, challenging conventional stability assumptions.
This paper presents a non-modal structural formulation in which non-holding is fixed as a fundamental condition. Non-holding is not treated as failure, breakdown, interruption, or absence. Instead, it is approached without causality, temporality, or subject-dependent interpretation. Within this framework, fixation is not assumed to persist, continue, or be retained. What is typically described in terms of transition, sequence, or derivation is reconsidered without introducing these notions. The paper does not propose an explanatory model. It situates non-holding as a structural fixation that challenges conventional assumptions about stability, persistence, and structural continuity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juza Minamikata (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: