Why the study?
Does D-dimer assay detect incomplete aneurysm exclusion after endovascular AAA repair?
Does D-dimer assay detect incomplete aneurysm exclusion after endovascular AAA repair?
Elevated D-dimer levels may serve as a noninvasive marker for fixation problems such as type I endoleaks and nonshrinking aneurysms after endovascular AAA repair.
D-dimer elevation may flag type I endoleak or sac nonregression after EVAR; leaves open its role as a noninvasive marker pending prospective validation.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that D-dimer (D-D), a cross-linked fibrin degradation product of an ongoing thrombotic event, could be a marker for incomplete aneurysm exclusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: In a multicenter study, 83 venous blood samples were collected from 74 AAA endograft patients and controls. Twenty subjects who were >6 months postimplantation and had evidence of an endoleak and/or an unmodified or increasing AAA sac diameter formed the test group. Controls were 10 nondiseased subjects >65 years old, 18 AAA surgical candidates, and 26 postoperative endograft patients with no endoleak and a shrinking aneurysm. Blood samples were analyzed for D-D through a latex turbidimetric immunoassay. The endograft patients were stratified into 5 clinical groups for analysis: no endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, no endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, type II endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, type II endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, and type I endoleak. RESULTS: Individual D-D values were highly variable, but differences among clinical groups were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). D-D values did not vary significantly between patients with stable, untreated AAAs and age-matched controls (238 +/- 180 ng/mL versus 421 +/- 400 ng/mL, p > 0.05). Median D-D values increased at 4 days postoperatively (963 ng/mL versus 382 ng/mL, p > 0.05) and did not vary thereafter if there was no endoleak and the aneurysm sac decreased. D-D mean values were higher in patients with type I endoleak (1931 +/- 924 ng/mL, p < 0.005) and those with unchanged/increasing sac diameters (1272 +/- 728 ng/mL) than in cases with decreasing diameters (median 638 +/- 238 ng/mL) despite the presence of endoleak (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated D-D may prove to be a useful marker for fixation problems after endovascular AAA repair and may help rule out type I endoleak, thus excluding patients from unnecessary invasive tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serino et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: