Key result
Systolic hypertension is linked to elevated pulse pressure driven primarily by increased aortic characteristic impedance.
Why the study?
Elevated pulse pressure is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but its determinants in uncomplicated systolic hypertension remain unclear.
What are the hemodynamic determinants of elevated pulse pressure in middle-aged and older subjects with uncomplicated systolic hypertension compared to normotensive controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=158)
What are the hemodynamic determinants of elevated pulse pressure in middle-aged and older subjects with uncomplicated systolic hypertension compared to normotensive controls?
p-value: p=<0.001
Elevated pulse pressure in systolic hypertension is primarily driven by increased characteristic impedance and reduced proximal aortic diameter, challenging the hypothesis of secondary aortic wall stiffening.
Challenges aortic stiffening hypothesis in systolic hypertension; hypothesis-generating for impedance-focused research pending longitudinal confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and is thought to be secondary to elastin fragmentation with secondary collagen deposition and stiffening of the aortic wall, leading to a dilated, noncompliant vasculature. METHODS AND RESULTS: By use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, arterial stiffness and pulsatile hemodynamics were assessed in 128 subjects with uncomplicated systolic hypertension (supine systolic pressure > or =140 mm Hg off medication) and 30 normotensive control subjects of comparable age and gender. Pulse-wave velocity was assessed from tonometry and body surface measurements. Characteristic impedance (Zc) was calculated from the ratio of change in carotid pressure and aortic flow in early systole. Effective aortic diameter was assessed by use of the water hammer equation. Hypertensives were heavier (P<0.001) and had higher PP (P<0.001), which was attributable primarily to higher Zc (P<0.001), especially in women. Pulse-wave velocity was higher in hypertensives (P=0.001); however, this difference was not significant after adjustment for differences in mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P>0.153), whereas increased Zc remained highly significant (P<0.001). Increased Zc in women and in hypertensive men was attributable to decreased effective aortic diameter, with no difference in wall stiffness at comparable MAP and body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PP in systolic hypertension was independent of MAP and was attributable primarily to elevated Zc and reduced effective diameter of the proximal aorta. These findings are not consistent with the hypothesis of secondary aortic degeneration, dilation, and wall stiffening but rather suggest that aortic function may play an active role in the pathophysiology of systolic hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Uncomplicated systolic hypertension (n=158). Systolic hypertension vs. Normotensive controls was evaluated on Characteristic impedance (Zc) (p=<0.001). Systolic hypertension was associated with elevated pulse pressure primarily due to higher characteristic impedance (P<0.001) and reduced effective aortic diameter, independent of mean arterial pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: