Why the study?
East Asians show different risk profiles for thrombophilia and bleeding than Western counterparts, prompting evaluation of the effect of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention between these populations.
Does low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg once daily) improve cardiovascular outcomes or increase bleeding in East Asians compared to Westerners without symptomatic cardiovascular disease?
Does low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg once daily) improve cardiovascular outcomes or increase bleeding in East Asians compared to Westerners without symptomatic cardiovascular disease?
Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention carries a substantially higher net harm in East Asians compared to Westerners due to increased major bleeding risk.
Greater caution warranted for low-dose aspirin primary prevention in East Asians; extends evidence of ethnic differences in net harm.
Background: East Asians have shown different risk profiles for both thrombophilia and bleeding than Western counterparts. Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the effect of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention between these populations. Methods: We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for intervention with low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg once daily) in participants without symptomatic cardiovascular disease until December 31, 2021. The number of events between the arms was extracted for analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) were analyzed in each population. Outcomes included a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage and major gastrointestinal bleeding). Results: < 0.001). The net RDs (RD of MACE plus RD of major bleeding) were 8.04 and 0.72 per 1,000 persons in East Asian and Western participants, indicating 124 and 1,389 of the net number needed to harm, respectively. Conclusions: Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention in East Asians must be cautiously prescribed because of the increased risk of major bleeding relative to Western counterparts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: