Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors show similar composite kidney outcomes compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in T2D.
Why the study?
Direct comparisons of kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes were needed.
Do SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=82,272)
Yes
Do SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Given the large amount of overlapping cardiorenal benefits from these medications in this study, a combination of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy is an important consideration. Because these agents differ with regard to glycemic control, weight loss, and select kidney and card...”
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists provide similar overall kidney and cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes, though SGLT2 inhibitors may offer greater protection against significant eGFR decline.
BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) improve kidney outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Direct comparisons of the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 RA with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a first-line therapy for this population, are needed. OBJECTIVES: The authors compared kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for new users of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs with T2D. METHODS: Using propensity score overlap weighting, we analyzed electronic health record data from 20 U.S. health systems contributing to PCORnet between 2015 and 2020. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring. In addition, we examined cardiovascular and safety outcomes. RESULTS: The weighted study cohort included 35,004 SGLT2i and 47,268 GLP-1 RA initiators. Over a median of 1.2 years, the primary outcome did not differ between treatments (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-1.02), although SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.91). Risks of mortality (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.93-1.14), and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13) did not differ. Genital mycotic infections were more common for SGLT2i initiators, but other safety outcomes did not differ. The results were similar regardless of chronic kidney disease status. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs led to similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D, though SGLT2i initiation was associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline. (Evaluating Comparative Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Population With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease; NCT05465317).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edmonston et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes (n=82,272). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. GLP-1 receptor agonists was evaluated on composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02). SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists led to similar risks for the primary composite kidney outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.81-1.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: