Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors show similar composite kidney outcomes compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in T2D.
Why the study?
Direct comparisons of kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes were needed.
Do SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=82,272)
Yes
Do SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Given the large amount of overlapping cardiorenal benefits from these medications in this study, a combination of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy is an important consideration. Because these agents differ with regard to glycemic control, weight loss, and select kidney and card...”
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists provide similar overall kidney and cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes, though SGLT2 inhibitors may offer greater protection against significant eGFR decline.
BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) improve kidney outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Direct comparisons of the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 RA with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a first-line therapy for this population, are needed. OBJECTIVES: The authors compared kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for new users of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs with T2D. METHODS: Using propensity score overlap weighting, we analyzed electronic health record data from 20 U.S. health systems contributing to PCORnet between 2015 and 2020. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring. In addition, we examined cardiovascular and safety outcomes. RESULTS: The weighted study cohort included 35,004 SGLT2i and 47,268 GLP-1 RA initiators. Over a median of 1.2 years, the primary outcome did not differ between treatments (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-1.02), although SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.91). Risks of mortality (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.93-1.14), and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13) did not differ. Genital mycotic infections were more common for SGLT2i initiators, but other safety outcomes did not differ. The results were similar regardless of chronic kidney disease status. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs led to similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D, though SGLT2i initiation was associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline. (Evaluating Comparative Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Population With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease; NCT05465317).
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edmonston et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes (n=82,272). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. GLP-1 receptor agonists was evaluated on composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.02). SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists led to similar risks for the primary composite kidney outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: