Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates fiber quality from V-HDPE/R-HDPE mixtures, suggesting improved sustainability in manufacturing.
In order to explore how different mass ratio combinations of virgin high-density polyethylene (V-HDPE)/recycled high-density polyethylene (R-HDPE) affect fibre and print quality, this study conducts a series of analyses. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is a process used for fibre preparation investigation; it is possible to include five groups of ratios between R-HDPE 100% and V-HDPE 100%. The process of filament extrusion is supplemented with optical microscope observation. This helps establish a correlation between the composition and microstructure of any bio-based or crude oil-derived material; thus, it achieves a bio-based or crude oil-derived derivative. The diameter uniformity is tested; tensile strength is evaluated; printing parameters are optimized. The tensile strength of the filament reaches the maximum value (25.7 ± 1.1 MPa) when the mass ratio of V-HDPE40%/R-HDPE60%; it is higher than 38.2% that of pure R-HDPE (18.6 ± 0.8 MPa). The tensile strength of the V-HDPE60%/R-HDPE40% system stands at 24.3 ± 1.0 MPa; it rises by 30.7% against pure R-HDPE and still outperforms pure V-HDPE and low-proportion mixed systems. The average fibre diameter remains consistently within the range of 1.86–1.90 millimeters (mm) when the V-HDPE content is between 20% and 40%. Controlling the diameter to within ±0.05 mm improves the layers’ adhesion. In contrast, the V-HDPE100% group has a distinct diameter with weak interlayer adhesion. The results show that the strength of the composites increases with the rise of V-HDPE content; it reaches the maximum at 40% V-HDPE. This means that the properties of 3D printing fibers manufactured from recycled materials can be improved by controlling the mixing and printing parameters; this makes it easy to develop sustainable composite materials for aerospace and automobile manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: