Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technical preprint proposes a non-particle model to explain cold dark matter behavior in galaxies, suggesting new origins.
This record is a Master Working Note / Extended Framework for the Holographic Residual Dark Matter (HRDM) model. It preserves the broader conceptual and mathematical development of the framework, including the pre-geometric holographic seed, critical surface-area initialization, projection lock-in, the residual gravitational component X, CDM-like effective behavior, galaxy-scale phenomenology, and merging-cluster interpretations. This document is not intended as a concise submission-ready paper. Focused papers derived from this master note, including a shorter Paper I on the core CDM-like component, will be released as separate records. This technical preprint proposes a minimal phenomenological model in which the cold-dark-matter-like gravitational component inferred from cosmological and astrophysical observations is reinterpreted as a non-particle holographic residual gravitational response. The model does not deny the phenomenological evidence for dark matter; rather, it asks whether the effective CDM component may originate from an inflationary holographic projection-locking transition. The residual component X is constructed to behave as CDM at the background and linear perturbation levels, with rho_X proportional to a^-3, w_X approximately 0, and c_s,X^2 approximately 0. The model also derives a galaxy-scale residual acceleration a_X = sqrt(a_b a_H), yielding v^4 = G M_b a_H, and interprets merging-cluster lensing/gas offsets as baryonic gas displaced from a pre-existing projected residual gravitational well rather than material transport of X. The work is presented as a speculative but mathematically organized phenomenological framework requiring further expert review, numerical tests, and comparison with existing dark matter, modified gravity, emergent gravity, and holographic dark matter models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming-Ko Chung (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: