Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article compares tax integration models for cross-border investments, indicating implications for efficiency and equity.
This article compares classical taxation, full imputation, shareholder relief and dividend exemption as methods of integrating corporate and shareholder taxation in respect of cross-border portfolio investment. Using doctrinal analysis and stylized rate-normalized illustrations drawn from Australia and European jurisdictions, it evaluates how each model performs against neutrality, efficiency, equity and international coordination once withholding taxes and residence-state relief are taken seriously. The article argues that, while full imputation performs well domestically, dividend exemption and well-calibrated shareholder relief travel better in open economies by reducing stranded tax, administrative complexity and discriminatory spillovers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowler-Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: