Systematic review explores generative AI effects on clinical skills and higher-order thinking in nursing education, highlighting key implications.
AIMS: This review synthesizes the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on nursing students' clinical competency, Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and educational outcomes to differentiate between procedural efficiency and deep cognitive retention. BACKGROUND: Generative AI and Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) offer personalized scaffolding. However, their comparative efficacy against conventional pedagogical approaches, such as face-to-face lectures and standard non-AI simulations, remains controversial, particularly regarding the potential trade-off between skill acquisition and cognitive depth. DESIGN: A systematic literature review guided by PRISMA 2020 guidelines. METHODS: A comprehensive search across seven databases (PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, IEEE Xplore, JSTOR) from 2015 to 2025 identified 14 eligible studies (7 RCTs, 7 Quasi-experiments) which were synthesized across East Asia, Europe and Africa. Quality was appraised using JBI tools, with the protocol registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Synthesis of 14 studies (n = 1107) reveals a critical divergence. AI interventions significantly improved psychomotor application, procedural skills and communication mechanics compared with traditional instructor-led teaching methods. However, findings on HOTS and retention were mixed; while GenAI enhanced inquiry-based problem solving, it occasionally compromised critical reflection and long-term knowledge retention compared with human-led instruction. Furthermore, a "gap in algorithmic empathy" was evident, with AI failing to effectively enhance cultural awareness. CONCLUSION: AI functions as a robust "pedagogical scaffold" for procedural simulation but risks inducing "cognitive offloading" if used passively. Educators must adopt a Hybrid-Scaffolded Model: leveraging AI for iterative drills while prioritizing human facilitation for deep cognitive consolidation, ethics and cultural safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasirun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: