Research note and metric proposal. AI retrieval systems increasingly compose answers from human-authored sources. This paper introduces Provenance Erasure Rate (PER) as a metric measuring the proportion of source-dependent claims in an AI-composed output that are presented without explicit attribution. PER does not ask whether an output is true; it asks whether the sources that made the output possible remain visible inside the composition. A motivating case study documents a Google AI Overview that constructed a false biography of a living author from real fragments in the author's published poetry: every fragment survived compression, but their provenance and meaning did not. PER for this output = 1.0 (total provenance erasure). PER is formalized with claim-grain weighting, distinguished from citation precision/recall and AIS-style support metrics (Rashkin et al. 2023; Gao et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023), and interpreted as an economic signal: a rate at which compositional authority migrates from named sources to system-level synthesis. The paper proposes PER as a candidate indicator for attribution-layer governance, labor accounting, and retrieval transparency. PER is orthogonal to content-preservation metrics (ROUGE, BERTScore) and complementary to existing citation evaluation frameworks. It measures the attribution gap — the space between what the system uses and what it credits. The metric emerges from the Semantic Economy framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18320411) but can be used independently of that framework. A validation agenda is outlined.
Lee Sharks (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: