Prospective cross-sectional study identifies school-related gaps and strengths in adolescents with inborn errors of immunity, suggesting improvements.
BackgroundAdolescents with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) experience disease-related absenteeism and psychosocial challenges that can compromise schooling. Evidence integrating perspectives across stakeholders is limited.ObjectiveTo map school-related strengths and gaps for adolescents with IEI across patients, caregivers, teachers, and classmates to inform actionable improvements.MethodsProspective cross-sectional study (May–June 2021) using multi-informant questionnaires co-created with researchers for Vall d’Hebron Research Institute and the Barcelona PID Foundation’s patient council. Instruments covered five domains (knowledge, adaptation, school’s understanding, coordination, and socialization) plus a cross-cutting prioritization of “most challenging areas.”Participants: 13 adolescents with confirmed IEI (13 schools), 21 parents, 13 tutor teachers, and 74 classmates. Descriptive analyses summarized agreement and free-text themes.ResultsHalf of the students reported difficulty keeping up academically. Most teachers (11/13) wanted additional IEI training; 8/13 lacked detailed medical information, and 7/13 schools had no absenteeism action protocol. Parents frequently endorsed unmet academic/social needs and favored disclosure to staff/classmates. Classmates showed positive social acceptance and strong interest in learning about IEI, while perceiving insufficient disease-specific information. Free-text comments highlighted anxiety on returning after hospitalizations and the importance of role-specific guidance for school staff. Overall, supportive peer environments contrasted with system gaps in protocols and school–healthcare coordination.ConclusionsIEI substantially affects schooling despite supportive peers. Priorities include co-developed, teacher-facing protocols for absenteeism, structured school–healthcare coordination pathways, and targeted educator training, disseminated via scientific societies and patient organizations. Future multicenter studies should validate stakeholder-aligned instruments and evaluate scalable implementation strategies to improve educational outcomes and quality of life in adolescents with IEI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivière et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: