Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical trial evaluates a bivalent conjugate vaccine's immunogenicity in animal models, suggesting enhanced protection against enteric fever.
IntroductionSalmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A cause millions of cases and thousands of deaths annually, predominantly affecting children in South and Southeast Asia. Following the licensure and World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification of a typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV), efforts have focused on developing a bivalent vaccine incorporating an S. Paratyphi A glycoconjugate component to increase vaccine coverage and protection against enteric fever.MethodsTo create the bivalent vaccine, the S. Paratyphi A serovar-specific O-antigen (O:2) was conjugated to the CRM197 carrier protein using different chemistries. 1−Cyano−4−dimethylaminopyridinium tetrafluoroborate (CDAP) chemistry was selected based on its simplicity in manufacturing, stability data, and immunogenicity observed in preclinical studies. The final bivalent formulation combined Vi–CRM197 (TCV) for S. Typhi and O:2–CRM197 for S. Paratyphi A. Immunogenicity was evaluated in animal models.ResultsThe newly developed bivalent vaccine was stable over time, when stored at 2–8 °C. A slight increase of free O:2 was detected, but remained below 15% after 1 year of storage. In preclinical models, the bivalent formulation elicited strong immune responses against both antigens, higher than the corresponding unconjugated polysaccharides. These results have guided the selection of the formulations to be tested in clinical studies.ConclusionsThis vaccine has the potential to broaden protection against enteric fever, particularly in high-incidence regions. Further clinical trials are ongoing to confirm efficacy and safety in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: