Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theorem shows propagated phase mismatch governed by spectral split in rotational transport channels, highlighting implications.
This Theorem shows that the propagated rotational mismatch between the protected and dressed transport channels is governed by the same spectral split (p − ω) that drives the T15 phase defect, read through a distinct propagator-level extraction. The protected channel has generator G₋ = pJ (pure antisymmetric rotor); the dressed channel has G₊ = pJ + 2aσ_z (antisymmetric core plus traceless symmetric deformation). The dressed propagator satisfies G₊² = −ω²I where ω = √(p² − 4a²), shifting the effective transport frequency from p to ω. The normalized propagated mismatch is: Δ̂μ(η) = −i[(p/ω)sin(ηω) − sin(ηp)] = −i(p − ω)Ξ(η,p,a) Five corollaries are established: shared common antisymmetric rotational carrier; generator-level invisibility of the symmetric deformation (Tr(SR) = 0 for symmetric S, antisymmetric R); exact factorization through (p − ω); generic visibility with isolated blind times characterized by p·sin(ηω) = ω·sin(ηp); small-deformation asymptotics of blind times governed by tan(ηp) = ηp; and discrete angular accumulation T_rot^k = cos(kθ)I + sin(kθ)A. T30 does not replace T15. T15 gives the exact phase defect. T30 gives the spectral-propagator interpretation of its rotational manifestation through a different readout of the same core. Status: Corollaries 30.1–30.5 solid by direct algebraic computation. All results are conditional on T15 architecture (identification of p and a) and T16/T17/T20 framework (Δφ(τ) = μ chain). Six-segment kernel expansion of Ξ in terms of [M_n, D_n] remains open. Dependencies: T15, T16, T17, T18, T19, T20, T23, T24, T25, T26, T27, T28, T29.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Edwin Holdway (2026) studied this question.