Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work demonstrates how gravitons form all matter and energy, suggesting a new theory of reality.
In this work, we further develop the faster than light (FTL) field model[1a,1b,1c], to show how all matter is derived of gravitons; (gravitons are the photons’ equivalent of the faster than light field). In the process of creating quarks and electrons from gravitons at extreme conditions, gravitons’ derivatives are formed and squeezed together. The combined particle of these processes is either an electron or a quark. Gravitons are also responsible for dark energy and dark matter signals, making gravitons the source of all energy in our real space. This model also explaining the source of the electron’s charge (and quarks’ charge): it is the electrical lobes of the gravitons that made it. Electrons and up and down quarks and photons are real entities, yet most other particles in the standard model are highly structured graviton layers, perhaps in combination with the real entities, that are identified as unique particles, in various experiments. The model further explaining that forces affect from a distance through FTL gravitons’ layering; the FTL layers formation was described in previous works and is further developed here, showing that gravity and electromagnetism have the same basic gravitons’ layering structure, yet different gravitons’ orientation and transients within. The strong force among quarks is simply a highly structured and very dense gravitons’ layers. So the FTL field model replaces all 17 fields that were suggested during the years in quantum field theory to describe reality. This model suggesting that anti matter does not cause anti gravity effects; as with photons, gravity is symmetric, in this respect. And different universes in the multiverse might have the opposite definition for anti matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ophir Flomenbom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: