Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study assesses infection risk reduction in hematological malignancies patients using IgRT, indicating significant effectiveness.
IntroductionIncreased risk of infections in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) is a growing concern. Immunoglobulin-replacement therapy (IgRT) is used to reduce infection risk in patients who develop secondary hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG). The effectiveness of IgRT in preventing infections, including COVID-19, has not been fully assessed. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of 10% human intravenous immunoglobulin caprylate-chromatography purified (IGIV-C10%) in reducing infection risk in HM patients with secondary HGG, including COVID-19 infections.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using PharMetrics Plus. The study included patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma (MM), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who developed HGG and initiated treatment with IGIV-C10% between July 2018 and June 2024. The index date was the first IGIV-C10% dose. Figure 1 includes additional details on study design and eligibility. The proportion of patients with severe infections and any infection over the post-index (exposed) period was compared to that during the pre-index (unexposed) period (including and excluding COVID-19 infections). A sensitivity analysis based on the month-year of the index was performed.Figure 1.Study design.ResultsOverall, 348 patients (NHL: 130, MM: 154, CLL: 64) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 64.6 (10.9) years; 53.2% were male. Of these, 62 (17.8%), 123 (35.3%), and 163 (46.8%) patients were identified during the pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 periods, respectively. Patients received 5.8 (1.2) IGIV-C10% doses, with a mean of 21.8 (17.5) grams-encounter. When excluding COVID-19 infections, the adjusted odds of severe infection and any infection were 53% (OR: 0.47; 0.33, 0.66; p < 0.001) and 66% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.34; 0.23–0.50; p < 0.001) lower during the IGIV-C10% period, respectively. The same trend was observed when including COVID-19 infections in the definitions of severe infections (OR: 0.41; 0.28, 0.60; p < 0.001) and any infections (OR: 0.36; 0.24, 0.54, p < 0.001). Similarly, the odds of severe infection were significantly reduced regardless of whether patients initiated IGIV-C10% therapy before, during, or after the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure 2).Figure 2.Graphical representation of patients included in the study based on index day and presence of severe infections during the post-index and pre-index periods, and adjusted odds, 95% confidence intervals, and p-value of severe infections during the post-index (exposed to IGIV-C10%) compared to the pre-index (unexposed to IGIV-C10%).ConclusionsRegular IGIV-C10% infusions are effective in reducing infections in HM patients with HGG. Similar effects were observed when including COVID-19 infections as an outcome and when effectiveness was assessed before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: