Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrative framework reveals that systemic interventions enhance rejuvenation in ageing organisms, suggesting targeted therapies.
Ageing is often modelled and prioritised as near-linear accumulation of cell-intrinsic lesions, yet late-life mortality risk accelerates exponentially following the Gompertz law. Furthermore, systemic interventions — including therapeutic plasma exchange and extracellular-vesicle-based therapies — together with the transient embryonic rejuvenation phase, can induce rapid, broadly coordinated organism-level rejuvenation on timescales difficult to attribute to gradual repair alone. Here, we propose an integrative-first hierarchical framework in which primary lesions provide the load, while organism-level signalling networks — especially senescence-associated intercellular communication — provide the gain, converting slow cellular inputs into self-amplifying late-life acceleration. This architecture provides a mechanistic basis for both the embryonic biological-age reset and Gompertzian late-life acceleration by positioning organism-level coupling as a central control layer governing ageing trajectories. It further implies regime-dependent therapeutic leverage: cell-autonomous approaches are most effective as early-life prevention and may slow progression in midlife, whereas durable late-life reversal requires systemic signalling reset that suppresses amplification and restores buffering capacity. By framing rejuvenation as a global state change, the framework positions cell-autonomous strategies, including partial reprogramming, as complementary to systemic recalibration and most effective when deployed within a rejuvenated systemic milieu.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierre-Edouard Sottas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: