Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This Zenodo record publishes the canonical public evidence capsule for Inference Receipts: Lightweight Cryptographic Commitment Chains for Auditable Generative AI. The archive contains the manuscript, complete figure set, benchmark summaries for experiments E1 through E10, example receipt chains, zero-dependency verification scripts, validation transcripts, checksum manifests, and the migration receipt that binds the public capsule inside the research repository. The supported claim boundary is narrow: model identity, sampling configuration, and emitted token or output payloads can be committed into low-cost, tamper-evident receipts under an honest-emitter trust model. The public archive supports checksum verification, receipt-hash verification, and replay-condition inspection for the shipped examples. This record does not claim proof-carrying faithful execution, a deployed public transparency-log service, universal deterministic replay across hardware or quantization choices, reliable false-claim rejection by the 7B DECIDE gate, or disclosure of production fingerprinting, canonicalization, routing, or deployment internals. The Zenodo archive is the canonical public release surface; no mutable public code repository is required for review within the stated claim boundary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noah Erlwein (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: