Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study enhances land use and cover classification using deep learning, suggesting improved monitoring techniques.
Land use and land cover (LULC) classification is essential for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and resource management. This study explores the performance of three state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, MobileNetV3, ResNet34, and GoogleNet, which were enhanced with transfer learning, data augmentation, and adaptive learning rate scheduling. We evaluate these models on two benchmark datasets: EuroSAT, consisting of Sentinel-2 satellite imagery across 10 land cover classes, and PatternNet, a high-resolution aerial dataset with 38 diverse classes. The results demonstrate that MobileNetV3 achieved the highest overall accuracy (97.83% on EuroSAT and 99.23% on PatternNet) with minimal inference time, making it ideal for real-time applications. ResNet34 achieved 97.56% and 99.06% accuracy, respectively, excelling in classifying complex, visually similar classes due to its residual learning blocks. GoogleNet's balanced performance and efficiency achieved 97.36% and 99.58% accuracy across both datasets. An ablation study confirmed that data augmentation, transfer learning, and learning rate scheduling contributed to improvements in accuracy of 5-13%. This research highlights the effectiveness of modern deep learning architectures and optimized training pipelines for LULC classification across diverse datasets, providing a foundation for future advancements in cross-domain remote sensing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raut et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: