Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article challenges common interpretations of Qur’anic warfare, suggesting a defensive approach to religious compulsion in believers' actions.
When are the qur’anic believers justified in waging war “in God’s way” ( fī sabīl allāh )? And, relatedly, when should they cease doing so and pursue peace instead? On such questions, Q Baqarah 2:193 and Q Anfāl 8:39—referred to here as “the fitnah -fighting verses”—appear to be especially relevant: “Fight them until there is no fitnah and al-dīn is wholly for God…” A common interpretation, endorsed by many scholars, glosses fitnah as shirk (associationism, idolatry) or kufr (repudiation, unbelief), and takes the dīn clause ( wa-yakūna l-dīnu kulluhu li-llāhi ) as a mandate to extirpate rival religions. This article challenges such an aggressive reading and instead upholds a minority, defensive interpretation, according to which fitnah refers to religious persecution and is functionally equivalent to ikrāh (religious compulsion). It is further proposed that the enigmatic locution, wa-yakūna l-dīnu kulluhu li-llāhi , ought to be understood as “ your worship ( dīnukum ) may be directed exclusively ( khāliṣan ) to God,” indicating that the believers themselves are able to worship freely, including at the Holy Sanctuary in Mecca. Thus, far from abrogating the non-compulsion ( lā ikrāha ) principle of Q Baqarah 2:256, the fitnah -fighting verses justify warfare in its armed defense.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javad T. Hashmi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: