Key result
Electron beam tomographic calcium scanning predicts significant coronary disease with ~0.84 AUC accuracy.
Why the study?
A model incorporating electron beam tomography-derived calcium scores to predict angiographically significant CAD in symptomatic patients without known CAD was needed to facilitate clinical triage.
Does electron beam tomography-derived calcium scoring improve the prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD?
Observational (n=1,851)
Does electron beam tomography-derived calcium scoring improve the prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD?
Effect estimate: ROC AUC 0.842
Electron beam tomographic calcium scanning provides independent and incremental predictive power for angiographically significant CAD, especially useful for clinical triage in intermediate-risk symptomatic patients.
Calcium scores may refine CAD probability estimates in symptomatic patients; leaves open whether models improve triage over standard assessment.
BACKGROUND: We sought to incorporate electron beam tomography-derived calcium scores in a model for prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Such a model could greatly facilitate clinical triage in symptomatic patients with no known CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 1851 patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary angiography for clinical indications. An electron beam tomographic scan was performed in all patients. Total per-patient calcium scores and separate scores for the major coronary arteries were added to logistic regression models to calculate a posterior probability of the severity and extent of angiographic disease. These models were designed to be continuous, adjusted for age and sex, corrected for verification bias, and independently validated in terms of their incremental diagnostic accuracy. The overall sensitivity was 95%, and specificity was 66% for coronary calcium to predict obstructive disease on angiography. With calcium scores >20, >80, and >100, the sensitivity to predict stenosis decreased to 90%, 79%, and 76%, whereas the specificity increased to 58%, 72%, and 75%, respectively. The logistic regression model exhibited excellent discrimination (receiver operating characteristic curve area, 0.842+/-0.023) and calibration (chi2 goodness of fit, 8.95; P=0.442). CONCLUSIONS: Electron beam tomographic calcium scanning provides incremental and independent power in predicting the severity and extent of angiographically significant CAD in symptomatic patients, in conjunction with pretest probability of disease. This algorithm is most useful when applied to an intermediate-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budoff et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=1,851). Electron beam tomography-derived calcium scores was evaluated on Prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease (ROC AUC 0.842). Electron beam tomographic calcium scanning provided excellent discrimination in predicting angiographically significant coronary artery disease with a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.842.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: