PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2002Psychosomatic Medicine241 citations

A Quantitative Review of Prospective Evidence Linking Psychological Factors With Hypertension Development

View Full Paper
TRThomas Rutledge

Key Points

  • To review evidence from prospective cohort studies on the link between psychological factors and hypertension development.
  • Keyword searches through MEDLINE and Psychlit databases yielded over 500 studies, with 10 meeting criteria for review.

Structured PICO

Do psychological factors (anxiety, anger, depression) predict the development of hypertension?

P
Population
15 prospective cohort studies with >1 year follow-up assessing psychological factors and hypertension development
I
Intervention
Psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, anger, depression)
O
Outcome
Hypertension developmentsurrogate

Psychological factors such as anger, anxiety, and depression are associated with a small but potentially clinically relevant increased risk of developing hypertension.

Limitations

  • Findings regarding potential mechanisms are scarce
  • Psychometric properties of the scales used to measure psychological variables are often not established

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively review and critique evidence from prospective cohort studies (greater than 1 year follow-up) assessing associations between psychological factors (eg, anxiety, anger, depression) and hypertension development. METHODS: Keyword searches through the MEDLINE and Psychlit (1970 to present) databases produced in excess of 500 studies, of which only 10 met criteria as a prospective cohort design with a follow-up interval exceeding 1 year. Five additional longitudinal studies were found by tracing references from the above papers. RESULTS: The sample-weighted aggregate effect sizes for hypertension risk were small for continuously measured psychological factors (r =.08), and effect sizes were similar for separate categories of psychological variables (r values =.07-.09). Effect sizes were not associated with reported methodological or sample characteristics, including sample size, racial and sex composition, study duration, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is moderate support for psychological factors as predictors of hypertension development, with the strongest support for anger, anxiety, and depression variables. Pooled effects for these factors are of sufficient magnitude to suggest potential clinical as well as statistical relevance. Findings regarding potential mechanisms are scarce and the psychometric properties of the scales used to measure psychological variables are often not established. Indications for future research are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Rutledge (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa863c5e51e5e53523ca00https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000031578.42041.1c
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Are symptoms of anxiety and depression risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study1997 · 515 citations
  2. 2Natural history of male psychological health, XIII: Who develops high blood pressure and who responds to treatment1996 · 12 citations
  3. 3Psychosocial predictors of hypertension in Black and White Africans1995 · 27 citations
  4. 4The Relationship of Depression to Cardiovascular Disease1998 · 1,546 citations
  5. 5Do anger and aggression affect carotid atherosclerosis?1993 · 57 citations