Why the study?
Does bivalirudin reduce platelet aggregation compared to unfractionated heparin in patients pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel undergoing elective PCI?
Does bivalirudin reduce platelet aggregation compared to unfractionated heparin in patients pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel undergoing elective PCI?
Bivalirudin provides additional inhibition of platelet aggregation compared to UFH when administered during elective PCI in patients pretreated with high-dose clopidogrel.
Supports bivalirudin preference for greater platelet suppression during elective PCI; extends pharmacodynamic comparisons versus UFH after high-dose clopidogrel.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) on platelet aggregation in patients, pretreated with a 600 mg loading dose clopidogrel, undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 100) were recruited consecutively in the setting of a double-blind, randomized trial. Bivalirudin or UFH was administered during PCI. Blood was drawn immediately before PCI, following administration of bivalirudin or UFH directly after PCI, and 24 h after PCI. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was assessed with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). Before PCI, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was similar in UFH and bivalirudin patients (P = 0.99 for LTA; P = 0.28 for MEA). Administration of bivalirudin during PCI resulted in significant additional suppression of platelet aggregation (P = 0.012 for LTA; P = 0.008 for MEA). Administration of UFH did not have a significant influence on platelet aggregation (P = 0.42 for LTA; P = 0.78 for MEA). Platelet aggregation was again similar in the two groups 24 h after PCI (P > 0.05 for LTA and MEA). CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin, given during PCI in patients pretreated with 600 mg of clopidogrel, is in contrast to UFH associated with further inhibition of platelet aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sibbing et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: