Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study analyzes clinical outcomes in patients with RCA-ACAOS, highlighting management gaps and suggesting functional evaluation.
Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus with an interarterial course (RCA-ACAOS with IAC) is an increasingly recognized incidental finding on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). However, standardized management protocols are lacking, and the real-world approach to these patients remains poorly characterized. This retrospective, single-center, observational study included all consecutive patients diagnosed with coronary artery anomalies by CCTA between April 2019 and April 2024. Baseline characteristics, anatomical high-risk features, management patterns, and clinical outcomes over a mean 37.3-month follow-up were analyzed. Among 4,560 patients who underwent CCTA, 27 (0.59%) had a coronary anomaly, with 15 (0.32%) having RCA-ACAOS with IAC. This group exhibited a higher prevalence of high-risk anatomical features like slit-like orifices (33.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.065) compared to other anomalies. The composite cardiac event rate was 22.2%, driven exclusively by unplanned coronary angiograms performed for suspected acute coronary syndrome, none of which identified a culprit lesion. While event rates were higher in the RCA-ACAOS with IAC group (26.7% vs. 16.7%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.357). Notably, functional stress testing was underutilized, with only 20% of RCA-ACAOS with IAC patients undergoing evaluation for inducible ischemia. RCA-ACAOS with IAC is generally associated with favorable outcomes and low event rates. Moving from a purely anatomical to a functionally guided management paradigm may improve patient care in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuks et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: