Underwater image enhancement has been widely studied to improve visual quality; however, its impact on downstream geometric tasks such as sparse 3D reconstruction remains insufficiently understood. In particular, visually enhanced images do not necessarily lead to improved feature matching or reconstruction performance. This work addresses the problem of selecting appropriate preprocessing strategies for underwater Structure-from-Motion (SfM) pipelines from a task-oriented perspective. We propose a lightweight machine-learning-based preprocessing selector that predicts reconstruction performance from image statistics and recommends suitable enhancement strategies for each input sequence. To ensure reliable evaluation, we introduce a grouped leave-one-parent-sequence-out protocol that avoids overlap-induced bias common in clip-wise splitting. Experiments are conducted on challenging underwater datasets derived from the Real-world Underwater Image Enhancement (RUIE) benchmark, with the primary comparison variable defined as the number of reconstructed sparse 3D points. Supporting geometric variables, including the number of registered images, mean track length, and mean reprojection error, are recorded for interpretation. Results show that preprocessing choices significantly affect reconstruction outcomes and that the optimal strategy is scene-dependent. The proposed selector consistently improved over raw input on the evaluated grouped subset and remained competitive with a strong fixed preprocessing baseline. The grouped leave-one-parent-sequence-out protocol is intended to reduce overlap-induced bias common in clip-wise splitting and to provide a more conservative estimate of generalization. This work highlights the importance of task-aware preprocessing and reliable evaluation in underwater vision systems, offering practical insights for deploying enhancement strategies in real-world 3D reconstruction pipelines.
Hu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: