Evaluation shows improved accuracy in controlling transtibial movements through multi-window voting in EMG classification.
Objective: This study investigates the optimization of surface EMG (sEMG) classification for seven transtibial movements using short analysis windows (64 ms) suitable for real-time control of below-knee prostheses. Methods: We systematically evaluated feature engineering strategies, dimensionality reduction techniques, and classification approaches using linear Support Vector Machines on four-channel sEMG data from the transtibial region. We compared amplitude-based versus derivative-based time-domain features, integrated frequency-domain features, and implemented multi-window majority voting with 50% overlap. Results: Evaluated across nine subjects (four male, five female), the optimized system achieves a population-level accuracy of 70.16%±7.09% with multi-window majority voting (per-subject range: 60.71–78.57%), with voting consistently improving accuracy over single-window classification by +7.06% on average. We demonstrate that PCA provides zero benefit for linear classifiers when all features are retained. Documented failed approaches include adaptive windowing and spectral entropy features. Conclusion: Careful feature engineering combining time-domain (MAV2, RMS, VAR, MAX, LOG, IEMG) and frequency-domain features (MPF, MF, band powers) with multi-window voting substantially recovers accuracy losses from aggressive window reduction while maintaining sub-100 ms latency suitable for prosthetic control. This work provides a validated methodology across multiple subjects for optimizing EMG classification latency–accuracy trade-offs, demonstrates that PCA is unnecessary for linear classifiers with well-engineered features, and documents negative results to guide future prosthetic control research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mireles-Preciado et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: