Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework reveals how agency affects the role of workers in climate action, suggesting strategies to address job losses and health risks.
This article develops a research framework for understanding workers and their unions as strategic actors in the climate transition, emphasising the centrality of their agency. While climate change poses profound challenges such as job losses, work reorganisation, and health risks, workers are often described as passive recipients of state or employer-led decisions. We conceptualise union engagement along two dimensions: the strategies they pursue (‘what’) and the factors shaping these strategies (‘why’). Drawing on existing literature and empirical observations, we first identify five generic strategies: abstentionist, unconditionally supportive, conditionally supportive, oppositional, and transformative, mapped along two dimensions: agreement with climate policies and engagement in climate action. Then, we propose a framework integrating internal factors, including worker interests, union power resources, and strategic capabilities, with external influences such as structural power, institutional power, societal discourse, and employer strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dupuis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: