Findings reveal agricultural geographical indications improve agglomeration, emphasizing input-output linkages and market access in China.
Marshallian agglomeration is typically attributed to input–output linkages, labor market pooling, and knowledge spillovers; however, empirical evidence on how these mechanisms operate in agricultural settings remains limited. This paper examines whether and how China's agricultural geographical indications certification fosters agricultural agglomeration. Exploiting the staggered rollout of this certification system since 2008 as a quasi‐natural experiment, we employ a staggered difference‐in‐differences design and find that certification significantly promotes county‐level agricultural agglomeration, primarily through strengthened input–output linkages: it encourages the colocation of upstream producers and downstream processors and deepens local production networks. In contrast, we find no significant effects through labor market pooling or knowledge spillovers. The agglomeration effects are concentrated in plant‐based certifications and are stronger in counties with better market access and transportation infrastructure. Overall, our findings extend Marshallian agglomeration theory to agriculture and provide new causal evidence on how agricultural geographical indications certification contributes to agricultural agglomeration as part of broader sectoral structural transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: