Review highlights intelligent algorithms for optimizing batching processes in sintering and blast furnace ironmaking, suggesting improvements in efficiency and cost.
Metallurgical batching—governing raw material proportioning across sintering, blast furnace ironmaking, converter steelmaking, and non-ferrous smelting—critically determines product quality, energy consumption, and production cost throughout the full process chain. Its inherent complexity, characterized by strong nonlinear physicochemical coupling, measurement delays of up to 1.5 h, and multi-source raw material disturbances, renders conventional linear programming and empirical methods inadequate for dynamic, multi-objective industrial environments. This review systematically examines 98 representative studies (2020–2026) on intelligent algorithms applied to metallurgical batching optimization. A two-dimensional analysis framework of the fusion algorithm function and metallurgical scene is established. All kinds of methods are divided into three categories: prediction-oriented, optimization-oriented and decision-oriented, covering four typical scenes of sintering burdening, blast furnace ironmaking, converter steelmaking and non-ferrous metal smelting. Traditional machine learning models achieve sintering burn-through point prediction with R2 ≈ 0.85 and offer superior interpretability via SHAP analysis. Deep learning architectures deliver blast furnace silicon content prediction with RMSE ≈ 0.04%, while multi-objective evolutionary algorithms provide mature Pareto optimization for batching cost and carbon objectives. Reinforcement learning holds long-term potential for closed-loop adaptive control but remains constrained by Sim-to-Real safety barriers. Converter steelmaking and non-ferrous smelting are identified as underexplored domains. Three priority directions are proposed: domain-adaptive predictive modeling for cross-plant generalization, real-time re-optimization embedding mechanism constraints, and safe reinforcement learning transfer via high-fidelity digital twins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: