PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Water0 citationsOpen Access

The Reliability of SBR System During COVID-19 and Its Impact on Water Quality of a Small Flysch River in Protected Areas

View Full Paper
EDEwa DacewiczKPKarol PlesińskiEŁEwa Łobos-Moysa

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of pandemic-related changes in treated wastewater on water quality and ecological status of the Raba River.
  • Evaluated the reliability of the Kasinka Mała wastewater treatment plant during pre-pandemic and COVID-19 periods.
  • Utilized standard and extended monitoring methods to assess ecological status and utility values of the river.
  • Conducted analysis of pollutants including BOD5, TSS, and ammonium nitrogen levels.
  • Water quality classification reduced due to high levels of biodegradable carbon and ammonium nitrogen.
  • During COVID-19, technological reliability of the treatment plant significantly declined for key pollutants.
  • Extended monitoring indicated prolonged water quality changes in flysch rivers under increased anthropopressure.

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of pandemic-related changes in treated wastewater on surface water quality and ecological status of the Raba River within the Natura 2000 site. Particular attention to the reliability of the Kasinka Mała wastewater treatment plant operating in this protected area during the two study periods—pre-pandemic (PP) and COVID-19 (CP)—was given. For this purpose, current standard monitoring methods (ecological status of a small flysch stream, existing and potential threats to the Natura 2000 site) and extended monitoring methods (river’s utility values, technological reliability of the treatment plant operating with SBR technology, reliability rating of the river as a sewage receiver) were used. The results indicated that biodegradable carbon compounds (as dissolved and suspended forms) and ammonium nitrogen were the dominant factors determining water quality. Their presence reduced the Raba River’s utility value—determined by what is required of surface water treatment—by at least one class. During the CP, the reliability analysis showed that the river remained in a reduced class for 145 days due to elevated BOD5 and nearly one-third of the year due to elevated TSS levels. For approximately half of the year, ammonium nitrogen concentrations exceeded the threshold of 1.8 mg·dm−3, thereby further reducing the class of water quality. Technological reliability of the WWTP during PP for BOD5, COD, TSS, NH4+–N, and PO4−3–P was 43%, 100%, 30%, 86%, and 100%, respectively. This means that permitted values of COD and PO4−3–P were maintained. The exceedances of limits concerned BOD5 (25 mg O2·dm−3 for 208 days), TSS (35 mg O2·dm−3 for 256 days), and NH4+–N (15 mg O2·dm−3 for 51 days). During CP, the technological reliability of the WWTP decreased rapidly for the following pollutants to 5%, 18%, 18%, 30%, and 89%, respectively. This means that permissible concentrations of BOD5 (25 mg O2·dm−3 for 347 days), COD (125 mg O2·dm−3 for 241 days), TSS (35 mg O2·dm−3 for 299 days), NH4+–N (15 mg O2·dm−3 for 256 days), and PO4−3–P (2 mg O2·dm−3 for 40 days) were exceeded. A two-year monitoring campaign has shown that small flysch rivers receiving treated wastewater may experience prolonged changes in water quality under conditions of increased anthropopressure. Effective ecosystem protection should, therefore, include extended monitoring and stricter management of BOD5, TSS, and NH4+–N in SBR systems in protected areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dacewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530cechttps://doi.org/10.3390/w18091096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper