PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Land0 citationsOpen Access

Spatial Differentiation of Potential Drivers of Grassland Degradation Across Urban Functional Zones in Inner Mongolia

View Full Paper
YMYong MeiInner Mongolia Normal UniversityBBatunacunInner Mongolia Normal UniversityCAChang AnInner Mongolia Normal University

Key Points

  • To reveal spatial differentiation of drivers of grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia's functional zones.
  • Analyzed grassland conversion processes at county level
  • Evaluated four functional zones: resource-oriented, center-service-oriented, agro-pastoral-oriented, ecological-oriented
  • Performed spatial analysis of drivers including human disturbance and climatic factors.
  • Land cover changed in 19.29%, 18.69%, 17.28%, and 4.67% of RO, CSO, APO, and EO regions respectively.
  • Grassland degradation primarily occurred in RO region, while other zones had variations in degradation.
  • Drivers included human activities, urbanization, and climatic factors, with distinct patterns across zones.

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global warming, grassland degradation (GD) in arid and semi-arid regions has become a critical issue constraining ecosystem stability and socio-ecological resilience. This study aims to reveal the spatial differentiation of drivers of GD across four functional zones in Inner Mongolia—resource-oriented (RO), center-service-oriented (CSO), agro-pastoral-oriented (APO), and ecological-oriented (EO)—at the county level, using grassland conversion processes as a structural proxy. The results show that land cover changed in 19.29%, 18.69%, 17.28%, and 4.67% of the RO, CSO, APO, and EO regions, respectively, with GR mainly occurring in the RO region, while GD was more prevalent in the other zones. Drivers of GD exhibit significant variations across functional zones. In the RO zone, land use change is primarily associated with human disturbance. In the CSO and APO zones, it is associated with human activities, climatic factors, and urbanization. In the EO zone, the identified drivers show strong spatial heterogeneity, with urbanization, grazing intensity, and climate change emerging as key associated factors in the Hulunbuir, Xilingol, and Arxar regions. Overall, the results reveal a spatial gradient in the relative importance of anthropogenic pressure and climatic stress, with broader implications for adaptive and place-specific dryland governance under ongoing warming and increasing aridification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530d6dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/land15050776
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration and plant diversity in grasslands of China—A meta-analysis2016 · 233 citations
  2. 2Divergences of Two Coupled Human and Natural Systems on the Mongolian Plateau2015 · 110 citations
  3. 3Rural land abandonment is too ephemeral to provide major benefits for biodiversity and climate2022 · 126 citations
  4. 4Prediction and Scenario Simulation of Carbon Emissions Peak of Resource-Based Urban Agglomeration with Industrial Clusters—Case of Hubaoe Urban Agglomeration Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia: Intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems2015 · 165 citations