Retrospective review achieved 100% technical success in EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy, highlighting safety profile and response predictions.
Background and Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of a newly refined 8F stent introducer featuring an ultra-tapered metal tip and a preloaded, partially covered, self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS) for one-step stent deployment during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). Methods: A retrospective review of 34 patients who underwent EUS-HGS using the refined PCSEMS between February 2024 and February 2025 was conducted using a prospectively collected database. An expert and a novice endoscopist performed procedures. The primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes included one-step deployment rate, adverse events, clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and predictors of one-step stent deployment. Results: The technical success rate was 100%, with 88.2% of deployments being one-step. Adverse events occurred in 14.7%. Clinical success was 94.1%. RBO occurred in 12 patients (37.5%), with a median time to RBO of 115 days (95% confidence interval, 91 to not reached). Endoscopic reintervention was successful in 91.7% (11/12). Outcomes were comparable between the expert and novice, except for procedure time. A narrow needle–scope angle (≤138°) was associated with successful one-step deployment (86.7% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.027). On multivariable analysis, a needle–scope angle ≤138° was the only independent predictor (odds ratio 26.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.50–457.4; P = 0.025) for one-step stent deployment. Conclusion: The refined dedicated 8F stent introducer, featuring an ultra-tapered metal tip and preloaded with a PCSEMS for one-step EUS-HGS, achieved excellent technical and clinical success with an acceptable safety profile, although larger prospective studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: