This research demonstrates mobile laser scanning achieves 85.2% tree detection in mixed-species forests, suggesting improvements can enhance accuracy.
Understanding forest dynamics requires reliable inventories that assess tree- and stand-level characteristics. Traditionally, this has relied on field measurements such as diameter at breast height (DBH), height, and crown attributes, but these methods are labor-intensive and spatially limited. Remote sensing, particularly Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), has expanded forest inventory capacity by generating three-dimensional structural information. Mobile laser scanning (MLS), a recent adaptation, offers flexible, high-resolution data collection, though its performance across complex forests is still being evaluated. This study assessed the effectiveness of MLS in detecting individual trees and estimating DBH in mixed-species forests of the Northeastern United States. We also evaluated the influence of tree- and plot-level characteristics on detection accuracy and DBH estimation. Results showed an 85.2% tree detection rate, a 23.5% commission rate, and a DBH root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.98 cm (9.65%). Among the variables tested, tree DBH was the only significant predictor of detection probability; tree density and relative density had minimal effect. These findings demonstrate that MLS can achieve precise DBH estimation when trees are correctly identified, but false detections remain a limitation. Further methodological improvements are needed to enhance accuracy in structurally complex forests and advance MLS for operational forest monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: